ARP Con Rod Bolt Query

PostPost by: AlfaLofa » Wed Oct 22, 2014 11:05 am

I have recently had my con rods and pistons balanced.

When I sent them off I used a set of new ARP bolts (only finger tight) to attach the caps to the rods.

When I got the rods back, the bolts had been tightened such that 40 ft/lb torque was required to loosen the bolts.

The ARP data sheet states that the bolts should be torqued to 55 ft/lb using assembly lubricant.

Can I still consider my bolts to be unused (and unstretched - whatever that is)?

P.S.
What does "the con rods should always be re-sized after new rod bolts are fitted" ????

P.P.S.
I've just found this article:
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/11 ... ewall.html
which contains this piece of frightening information (so my bolts might be b******d):
Attachments
ARPBolt.jpg
ARPBolt.jpg (62.3 KiB) Viewed 1155 times
Steve
'64 S1 Elan (Owned since '73)
'69 Alfa Romeo 1750 Spider Veloce (Owned since '77)
'70 Morris Minor 1000 (Owned since '85)
User avatar
AlfaLofa
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 513
Joined: 19 Aug 2006

PostPost by: rgh0 » Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:21 pm

The bolts should not have been over stretched by tightening to only 40 ft-lbs. Typically you would need to go to twice that value to be at risk of yielding and stretching the bolt.

When installing the bolts use a stretch gauge if you can rather than torque and stretch to the ARP specified amount. Measure the bolt length before its installed and note it down and replace bolts if the length changes when you strip the engine next time. In a road engine ARP bolts should be good for ever and multi0ple rebuilds if not abused when installing.

The comments on resizing the rods when installing new bolts applies to the US engines that typically use a pressed in rod bolt and nut as shown in the pictures rather than the Lotus / UK Ford arrangement of a bolt that screws into the rod. The act of pressing in new rod bolts can distort the big end which is why it needs to be checked and resized if needed. This is not an issue with twin-cam rods

cheers
Rohan.
User avatar
rgh0
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 8834
Joined: 22 Sep 2003

PostPost by: AlfaLofa » Wed Oct 22, 2014 2:27 pm

Thanks Rohan!

I'll get hold of stretch gauge.
Steve
'64 S1 Elan (Owned since '73)
'69 Alfa Romeo 1750 Spider Veloce (Owned since '77)
'70 Morris Minor 1000 (Owned since '85)
User avatar
AlfaLofa
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 513
Joined: 19 Aug 2006

PostPost by: sutol64 » Sat Jul 23, 2016 1:44 am

what is the arp bolt part # ? i need to get some ! TIA
sutol64
New-tral
 
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Jul 2011

PostPost by: AHM » Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:49 am

You measure the stretch because the Young's modulus of a material gives a more accurate measure of clamping force than applied torque.

Re-sizing is where you machine the mating faces a few thou so that the rod is now too small - Then machine to the correct size. This ensures that it is the correct shape and size.
AHM
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1453
Joined: 19 Apr 2004

PostPost by: CBUEB1771 » Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:37 pm

sutol64 wrote:what is the arp bolt part # ? i need to get some ! TIA


Unfortunately ARP does not list big end bolts for the 125E connecting rods in their catalogue, so I can't provide a part number. However they are available from many of the usual sources such a QED, Kelvedon and Burton, assuming that you are in the UK. There are two versions available, one for standard connecting rods and one for steel rods. I am not really certain of the differences. Images on QED's web site show differences in details of the under-head section and unthreaded shank.
Russ Newton
Elan +2S (1971)
Elite S2 (1962)
User avatar
CBUEB1771
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: 09 Nov 2006

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: Erikt and 30 guests