Ring gear diameter
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I am about to have the flywheel refaced, lightened and a new ring gear fitted. The workshop has asked for spigot diameter to machine the flywheel for the ring gear. I am a little confused as I thought it was a simple heat and shrink operation so have gone back to them asking "why". Does anyone know what size the spigot diameter should be for a standard, road going cast iron flywheel for a 110 tooth ring gear?
Dave
Dave
Elan +2
Elise mk 1
Elise mk 1
- Donels
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 690
- Joined: 10 Sep 2016
I have these diamensions as I presume it is the same for the preXflow engines but it would be better to get a confirmation from another source.
Brian
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
-
types26/36 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 3877
- Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Dave
I can confirm that Brian?s dimensions are correct. The Lotus flywheel along with the pre 1970 pushrod engines had a spigot diameter of 10.048? (S110/10FR) . Post 1970 Pushrod engines had a larger Spigot diameter of 10.167? (A110/10R) although the Lotus flywheel remained the same until the end of production.
Having spent many years lightening and balancing engine components my advice would be not to have the original Lotus Flywheel lightened. Compared to some of the Ford Pushrod flywheels the Lotus flywheels are much lighter in their standard form. The small amount that you would be able to remove safely would have a negligible effect on engine performance .
Nick.
I can confirm that Brian?s dimensions are correct. The Lotus flywheel along with the pre 1970 pushrod engines had a spigot diameter of 10.048? (S110/10FR) . Post 1970 Pushrod engines had a larger Spigot diameter of 10.167? (A110/10R) although the Lotus flywheel remained the same until the end of production.
Having spent many years lightening and balancing engine components my advice would be not to have the original Lotus Flywheel lightened. Compared to some of the Ford Pushrod flywheels the Lotus flywheels are much lighter in their standard form. The small amount that you would be able to remove safely would have a negligible effect on engine performance .
Nick.
- avro
- Second Gear
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 19 Aug 2011
Donels wrote:Thanks all for the input. A quick measure confirms its closer to 10.048 rather than 10.167.
Nick, have you had bad experience with a lightened cast flywheel?
Dave
Dave
Not personally but many years ago l was asked to inspect a cast flywheel assembly ( or what was left of it) . It had been lightened to the extreme and had been used on a race Mini engine. The flywheel assembly exploded during a race. It came through the aluminium bellhousing , through the car bulkhead and the driver sustained serious injury.
I had on occasions after that refused to balance some flywheels, including Fords if l felt that they had been over lightened.
Nick
- avro
- Second Gear
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 19 Aug 2011
Ouch! Doesn?t bear thinking about, given the orientation of the flywheel in a Mini (provided the car wasn?t LHD)
1966 Elan S3 Coupe
1994 Caterham 7
1994 Caterham 7
- englishmaninwales
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 760
- Joined: 26 Jul 2013
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests